Legal Opinion
Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and Indus.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 23, 1999No. 22486-1-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
977 P.2d 668 (1999)
Dianne L. COCKLE, Respondent,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES OF the State of WASHINGTON, Appellant.
No. 22486-1-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
June 3, 1999.
As Amended on Denial of Reconsideration July 23, 1999.
Terry James Barnett, Rumbaugh Rideout Barnett, Tacoma, for Respondent.
John R. Wasberg, Dept. of Labor & Industries Office of the Atty. Gen., Seattle, for Appellant.
Nancy Thygesen Day, Perkins Coie LLP, Seattle, for Amicus Curiae Washington Self-Insurers Assoc.
MORGAN, J.
The question in this appeal is whether the Department of Labor and Industries…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- John Doe v. Puget Sound Blood CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Somsak v. CRITON TECHNOLOGIESCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Appeal of GagnonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Gallo v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Anthony Yuchasz v. Department Of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.