Legal Opinion
Somsak v. CRITON TECHNOLOGIES
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 19, 2002No. 48948-8-IPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
52 P.3d 43 (2002)
113 Wash.App. 84
Mary J. SOMSAK, Appellant,
v.
CRITON TECHNOLOGIES/HEATH TECNA, INC., Respondent.
No. 48948-8-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
August 19, 2002.
Gordon C. Klug, Eims & Flynn P.S., Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Christine A. Foster, Seattle, WA, for Respondent, Mary Jo. Somsak.
John R. Wasberg, Department of Labor & Industries, Seattle, WA, for Respondent Department of Labor & Industries.
APPELWICK, J.
A jury found that Mary J. Somsak's industrial insurance benefits did not include compensation she was entitled to for overtime hours and health care benefits. A…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Lynn v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Lynn v. STATE DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Deborah Ewing v. Green Tree Services LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.