Legal Opinion

Brechner v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 22, 1956No. Reap. Dec. 8599; Entry No. W-05459-2, etcPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MollisoN, Judge:

These are appeals for reappraisement of the values of certain merchandise of various kinds exported from Japan in 1950. All of the merchandise was entered under so-called duress under the provisions of section 503 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as in force and effect at the time of importation.1 Each of the invoices involved shows a “first cost” price for the merchandise, alleged to represent the price paid to the manufacturer for the merchandise, and certain costs, charges, and expenses, including some or all of the following: Export packing, inland freight from the factories…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Case & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Louis Goldey Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Hub Floral Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Panation Trade Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. Brentwood Originals v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API