Evanich v. Bridge
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Carr, Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellants Steven and Margaret Bridge (“Bridge”) have appealed from the decision of the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas, which concluded that appellees William and Roselyn Evanich (“Evanich”) had gained title to a portion of their property by adverse possession. This court affirms.
I
{¶ 2} The instant matter presents a convoluted procedural history. On October 17, 2002, Evanich filed a complaint to quiet title in the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas. The complaint alleged that Evanich had gained title to a portion of Bridge’s property by adverse possession. On July 27,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SaxonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Grace v. KochOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. D'AmbrosioOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. GillardOhio Supreme Court · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- HILLSMERE SHORES IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, INC. v. SingletonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Carson v. DuffOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Brown v. AllalaOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Evanich v. BridgeOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Estate of Barnett-Clardy, 08ap-386 (11-25-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.