Legal Opinion

State v. Saxon

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2006No. 2004-1877PublishedCited by 534 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} The question before this court is whether an appellate court may modify or vacate the entire multiple-offense sentence when a defendant assigns as error the sentence as to only one or more of those offenses but not the entire multiple-offense sentence. We find that it may not.

{¶ 2} The Cuyahoga County Grand Jury indicted appellee, Mark Saxon, in a six-count indictment alleging two counts of gross sexual imposition involving a victim under the age of 13, in violation of R.C. 2907.05, one count of importuning, in violation of R.C. 2907.07, two counts of gross sexual imposition, in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. D'AmbrosioOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by534 opinions

  1. State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Donald Williams, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Carl S. Anderson, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. State v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. SingletonOhio Supreme Court · 2009

529 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API