State v. Saxon
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} The question before this court is whether an appellate court may modify or vacate the entire multiple-offense sentence when a defendant assigns as error the sentence as to only one or more of those offenses but not the entire multiple-offense sentence. We find that it may not.
{¶ 2} The Cuyahoga County Grand Jury indicted appellee, Mark Saxon, in a six-count indictment alleging two counts of gross sexual imposition involving a victim under the age of 13, in violation of R.C. 2907.05, one count of importuning, in violation of R.C. 2907.07, two counts of gross sexual imposition, in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. D'AmbrosioOhio Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by534 opinions
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Donald Williams, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Carl S. Anderson, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- State v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SingletonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
529 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.