Legal Opinion

Dressel v. Hanser

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action to procure a decree requiring reassignment of a bond and mortgage and an accounting of interest received by defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtMullan, J.

The plaintiff, owning a bond and mortgage securing $2,500, on April 9,1915, assigned them to the defendant Hanser, and on May 13, 1915, the latter executed an instrument reading as follows:

“ Know all men by these presents, that I, Julius M. Hanser, of the borough of the Bronx, city and state of New York, do hereby affirm and declare that the mortgage made by E. Marion Toussaint to Andrew Dressel, on the 19th day of November, 1914, and assigned by *575Mm to the said Julius M. Hauser on the 9th day of April, 1915, is to belong to the said Andrew Dressel, and that the said Julius M. Hanser makes no…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Nellis v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  3. Ford v. . HarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  4. Boyd v. . De La MontagnieNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Place v. . HaywardNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pierce v. PierceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. Palumbo v. PalumboNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Fellner v. MarinoCity of New York Municipal Court · 1956
  4. Tiedemann v. TiedemannNew York Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Grudberg v. Midvale Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API