Legal Opinion

Fellner v. Marino

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 21, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard L. Midonick, J.

The plaintiff sues the defendants for fraud and deceit alleging damages in the amount of $2,685. The trial and this opinion do not concern themselves with Marino, against whom a default judgment had been entered and whose case had been severed from that of the Golds.

The occasion for this opinion is a motion by the defendants Gold to set aside a verdict against them in the full amount of $2,685 and to dismiss the complaint against them as a matter of law. Even if it be assumed, argue the defendants Gold, that the jury properly found that these defendants were in fact responsible for the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Tracy v. . TalmageNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  3. Ford v. . HarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  4. Boyd v. . De La MontagnieNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Place v. . HaywardNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. A. M. Kidder & Co. v. Clement A. Evans & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Palumbo v. PalumboNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Vrooman v. Village of MiddlevilleNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Adams v. ManownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Adams v. ManownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API