Legal Opinion

Grudberg v. Midvale Realty Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMullan, J.

Plaintiff, a member of this bar, sued, and has obtained judgment against defendant, for a commission upon the sale- of a parcel of realty. The evidence warrants findings that plaintiff was employed by defendant as a broker, and that he was the procuring cause of the sale to the buyer, one Licausi. Nevertheless, I am of the opinion that the maxim ex turpi causa non oritur actio should bar recovery. In 1917 plaintiff, acting *559as an attorney, represented the uncle of Licausi in a transaction that resulted in a lease, by defendant, to Licausi’s uncle, of the premises here in question. In some…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nellis v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. Moseley v. . MoseleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. Doucet v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. Dressel v. HanserNew York Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Grand Nat. BankDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API