Legal Opinion
Klotzbach-Piper v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 15, 2019No. Civil Action No.: 18-1702 (RC)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge *178I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Karen Klotzbach-Piper brought this suit against Defendant the National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak") on July 20, 2018, claiming that she was discriminated against on the basis of her gender, age, and disability while working at Amtrak between 2014 and 2018. Amtrak now moves to dismiss five of the ten claims Klotzbach-Piper brings in her complaint. Amtrak argues that Klotzbach-Piper's claims of hostile work environment based on gender and age are time-barred, that Klotzbach-Piper failed to exhaust her…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Adams v. Fort Myer Construction CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Buitrago v. D.C. Department of HealthDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Dehaarte v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Dida v. Ascension Providence Health Care ProvidersDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
- Dida v. Ascension Providence Health Care ProvidersDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.