Legal Opinion
Adams v. Fort Myer Construction Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 8, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2025-1949Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MATTHEW ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:25-cv-1949 (TNM) FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER* As associate general counsel to Fort Myer Construction Corporation, Matthew Adams complained about racial discrimination within the company. Adams says the company fired him for those complaints. He now sues his former employer, bringing retaliation claims under federal and District law. Fort Myer moves to dismiss the Complaint. For the reasons below, the Court denies that motion. I. Adams began working as associate…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jones v. BernankeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Gary Hamilton v. Timothy GeithnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- J. DeMasters v. Carilion ClinicCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.