Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1971No. 7129SC100PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant’s first assignment of error is as follows: “1. The Court erred in that the Trial Judge allowed a motion to Quash and then later allowed the State to proceed on the quashed bill of indictment 68 CR 238-B, without it being resubmitted to the Grand Jury. (Page 14) ” We are not referred to any exception. It is true that page 14 of the record contains a motion to quash indicating it was signed by counsel for defendant. No filing date is shown, nor does the record indicate the action taken thereon by the court, nor is any exception noted in the record. In the “Statement of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MosesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Balint v. GraysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Midgett v. MidgettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Bost v. Citizens National BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DeeseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. State v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API