State v. Young
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Defendant’s first assignment of error is as follows: “1. The Court erred in that the Trial Judge allowed a motion to Quash and then later allowed the State to proceed on the quashed bill of indictment 68 CR 238-B, without it being resubmitted to the Grand Jury. (Page 14) ” We are not referred to any exception. It is true that page 14 of the record contains a motion to quash indicating it was signed by counsel for defendant. No filing date is shown, nor does the record indicate the action taken thereon by the court, nor is any exception noted in the record. In the “Statement of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. MosesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Balint v. GraysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Midgett v. MidgettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Bost v. Citizens National BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. DeeseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981