Legal Opinion

Hageman v. Southwest General Health Center

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2008No. 2007-0376PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

I

{¶ 1} This case presents the issue of whether an attorney may be liable for the unauthorized disclosure to a third party of medical information regarding an opposing party that was obtained through litigation. For the following reasons, we hold that an attorney may be held liable for such an unauthorized disclosure. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the case for further proceedings.

II

{¶ 2} In January 2003, appellee, Kenneth Hageman, began meeting with Dr. Thomas Thysseril for psychiatric treatment. In his first treatment session, Hageman admitted having…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Briscoe v. Reader's Digest Association, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Biddle v. Warren General HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hageman v. Southwest Gen. Health Ctr., Unpublished Decision (12-21-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Med. Mut. of Ohio v. SchlottererOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Roe v. Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio RegionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Skorvanek v. Dept. of Rehab & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Menorah Park Ctr. for Senior Living v. Rolston (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Wallace v. Mantych MetalworkingOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API