Legal Opinion

Alberts v. Devine

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 4, 1985PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

In this action, brought by William E. Alberts, a minister of the United Methodist Church, against Donald T. Devine, a psychiatrist, and Edward G. Carroll and John E. Barclay, two of the plaintiff’s clerical superiors, we hold that: (1) unless faced with a serious danger to the patient or to others, a physician owes a patient a duty not to disclose without the patient’s consent medical information about the patient gained in the course of the professional relationship, and the violation of that duty gives rise to a civil action for whatever damages flow therefrom; (2) a civil action will lie…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Everson v. Board of Ed. of EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Rakes v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. Heard v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Lee v. CorregedoreHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hutchison v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API