Schumaker v. Ivers
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Justice.
Defendant appeals from a judgment ordering him to repay to plaintiffs the purchase price of a certain electric organ. We affirm.
On November 30, 1972, plaintiffs went to defendant’s music store for the purpose of looking at electric organs. Plaintiffs look ed at several models and discussed the matter with defendant, who recommended the organ in question, described in the testimony as a Story Clark Magi model. Defendant suggested that plaintiffs permit him to deliver the organ to their home on a trial basis. Plaintiffs agreed that defendant could do so, and the organ was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lynx, Inc. v. Ordnance Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Tiger Motor Co. v. McMurtrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Lanners v. WhitneyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Performance Motors, Incorporated v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Hays Merchandise, Inc. v. DeweyWashington Supreme Court · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Erling v. Homera, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- McGilbray v. Scholfield Winnebago, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Fortin v. Ox-Bow Marina, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Chmill v. Friendly Ford-Mercury of Janesville, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- Cundy v. International Trencher Service, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.