Legal Opinion
Fortin v. Ox-Bow Marina, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided August 13, 1990PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
The plaintiffs, Robert and Marie Fortin, filed this action to seek money damages arising from their brief ownership of a trouble-plagued thirty-two foot Bayliner Conquest power boat, which they had purchased in 1985 from the defendant, Ox-Bow Marina, Inc. Relief was sought under the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) (G. L. c. 106 [1988 ed.]), on the grounds of revocation of acceptance and breach of warranties; G. L. c. 93A (1988 ed.), alleging unfair trade practices; and on common law negligence. The matter was tried before a judge in the Superior Court, sitting without a jury. The judge ruled…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- First Pennsylvania Mortgage Trust v. Dorchester Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Conte v. Dwan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cole Energy Development Company v. Ingersoll-Rand CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Knapp Shoes, Inc. v. Sylvania Shoe Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- P & F Construction Corp. v. Friend Lumber Corp. of MedfordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Luson International Distributors, Inc. v. Fabricating and Production MacHinery Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. Carlton Aluminum of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.