Legal Opinion

McGilbray v. Scholfield Winnebago, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1977No. 48,138PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.:

This is a "revocation of acceptance” case under the Uniform Commercial Code. Suit was brought by the purchaser of a Winnebago motor home against the seller to enforce a written revocation of acceptance, pursuant to K. S. A. 84-2-608. The seller prevailed in the trial court, and the purchaser appeals.

The plaintiff, Norris V. McGilbray, purchased a Winnebago motor vehicle (WMV) from defendant Scholfield Winnebago, Inc. and took delivery at Wichita on January 2, 1973. He bought the vehicle for use on family trips and vacations, and to travel to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tiger Motor Co. v. McMurtrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. Jorgensen v. PressnallOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. General Motors Corporation v. EarnestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  4. Kaw Valley State Bank & Trust Co. v. RiddleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Schumaker v. IversSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Rosemount Dodge-Winnebago SouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Black v. Don Schmid Motor, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Jensen v. Seigel Mobile Homes GroupIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Erling v. Homera, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. In Re the Estate of FinkCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API