United States v. Fifty Boxes & Packages of Lace
District Court, S.D. New York
On Motion to Suppress Depositions.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
In the above cases, which are informa-tions for forfeitures of laces and other goods under (he customs revenue laws of the United States, two commissions were issued under a dedimus potestatem pursuant to the provisions of section *602866 of the Revised Statutes to take the testimony of foreign witnesses in behalf of the government, one at London and one at Paris. Upon the execution and return of the commissions, a motion is made on the part of the defendants to suppress them on the general ground that they have not been executed in all particulars in precise conformity…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Gormley v. BunyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Rust v. . EcklerNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Bischoffscheim v. BaltzerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nieman v. Plough Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- The NinfaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1907
- The TitanicDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1913
- Encyclopædia Britannica Co. v. Werner Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1905
- Hawks v. YanceyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.