Ktistakis v. The Liberian S.S. Star
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER E. HOFFMAN, District Judge.
The single question presented at this stage of the proceedings is whether, in the absence of a stipulation or agreement, a deposition de bene esse in admiralty may be taken in a foreign country before an officer of that country authorized to administer an oath. The question must be answered in the negative.
It has been held that a deposition de bene esse could not be taken in the Canal Zone, a possession of the United States but not a part thereof, under former § 639, Title 28 U.S.C. See: Huasteca Petroleum Co. v. United States, D.C.E.D.N.Y.1926, 14 F.2d 495.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dowling v. Isthmian S.S. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Mercado v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Bischoffscheim v. BaltzerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1882
- Bird v. HalsyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1898
- The AlexandraDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Otis McAllister & Co. v. The S.S. MarchoveletteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961