Legal Opinion

Ktistakis v. The Liberian S.S. Star

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided May 29, 1958No. 284PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WALTER E. HOFFMAN, District Judge.

The single question presented at this stage of the proceedings is whether, in the absence of a stipulation or agreement, a deposition de bene esse in admiralty may be taken in a foreign country before an officer of that country authorized to administer an oath. The question must be answered in the negative.

It has been held that a deposition de bene esse could not be taken in the Canal Zone, a possession of the United States but not a part thereof, under former § 639, Title 28 U.S.C. See: Huasteca Petroleum Co. v. United States, D.C.E.D.N.Y.1926, 14 F.2d 495.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dowling v. Isthmian S.S. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Mercado v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  3. Bischoffscheim v. BaltzerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1882
  4. Bird v. HalsyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1898
  5. The AlexandraDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Otis McAllister & Co. v. The S.S. MarchoveletteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API