Reupke v. D. H. Stuhr & Son Grain Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Scott District Court.- — • HoN. J. W. BolliNgee., Judge. Suit to recover compensation for personal services. Trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.—
1Opinion of the Court
Si-iERWiN, C. J. — •
The defendant was a corporation, *633whose business was managed by D. H. Stuhr. Stuhr was given authority to employ the help necessary to properly conduct the, business, and contracted for the plaintiff’s services as a grain solicitor for the term of one year from the 15th day of August, 1902. The defendant discharged him before the • expiration of this time, and this suit was brought to recover the contract price for his services for the months of May and June. Stuhr was not employed for a fixed period, and the appellant contends that he had no power to contract with the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Davenport v. Peoria Marine & Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Ceeder v. H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Steinke v. YetzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
3Cited by10 opinions
- Maple Island Farm, Inc. v. BitterlingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Eggers v. Armour & Co. of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Willis v. SchertzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Pedicord v. Elm Grove Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1931
- Trolinger v. CluffIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.