Legal Opinion

Trolinger v. Cluff

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1936No. 6256PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

This action was brought by appellant seeking to cancel, annul and set aside a judgment entered against him, the sole reason urged being that when the judgment was entered appellant was a minor and did not appear by general guardian and no guardian ad litem was appointed in the action in which the judgment was entered.

The findings of the court, which are sustained by the evidence, clearly relate the situation: May 9, 1933, respondent herein instituted an action against appellant to recover damages. Summons was served upon appellant and he then appeared in said action by demurrer, amendment to…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Kemp v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
  3. Foley v. California Horseshoe Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Harris v. . BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Rima v. Rossie Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Berg v. KendallIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hamilton v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Nesbitt v. NesbittCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Goodall ex rel. Fitzpatrick v. Doss ex rel. DossCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
  5. Whitney v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API