Legal Opinion

Willis v. Schertz

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 16, 1919PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Calhoun District Court. — E. G. Albert, Judge. Action for damages consequent upon the collision of automobiles resulted in a verdict for plaintiff and judgment thereon. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLade, C. J.

1- futyTfAgu4t care?ercise I. At about two o’clock in the afternoon of May 19, 1918, Charles Kleen was driving an automobile in an easterly or northeasterly direction along the highway between the Twin Lakes; and, after passing over the bridge which spans the stream flowing from one lake to the other, observed an automobile, operated by the defendant, approaching from the north, or northeast. Hie Kleen, cousin of Charles, was sitting in the front seat with him-, and with the plaintiff on her lap, both being his .guests. No one was in the back seat. The evidence was such that the jury might…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bailey v. City of CentervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. Heiman v. FelderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Gronan v. KukkuckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  4. Worez v. Des Moines City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Beems v. Chicago Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Briney v. Tri-State Mutual Grain Dealers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  2. Brown v. GuiterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  3. Bradley v. Interurban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. Heavilin v. WendellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Glanville v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API