Legal Opinion

Martin v. Miller

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 18, 1995No. 94-60575PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

Since the earliest days of our republic, federal law has afforded a remedy to seamen when payment of their wages is delayed without sufficient cause. Since 1915, the law has required the master or owner of the vessel to pay a seaman twice his daily wage for each day that payment is unjustifiably delayed. In this case, seaman Cathleen Martin seeks to collect these double wage damages in the amount of $155,828.88 from the master of the vessel, Michael Miller, in his individual capacity. This ease is complicated by the fact that the vessel, although operated by a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Hust v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. William G. O'connell, III v. Interocean Management CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. Abdulhalim Ali v. Robert RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Stewart v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1995
  4. Sam v. Keystone Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
  5. Arkansas River Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API