Legal Opinion
Siano v. Haber
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 29, 1999No. 97 Civ. 2459 DCPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHIN, District Judge.
In this employment case, plaintiff Angelina Siano alleges that defendants unlawfully terminated her employment because of her age. Defendants move for Summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Although plaintiff was seventy-one years old when defendants fired her, she was already sixty-four years old when they hired her. Moreover, defendants present compelling evidence that Siano was unable to adapt to her job as it evolved over time. On the record before the Court, no reasonable jury could conclude that defendants discharged her…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Connell v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Schreiber v. WORLDCO, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Rodriguez v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Tomney v. International Center for the Disabled & Local 815District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Pronin v. Raffi Custom Photo Lab., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.