Legal Opinion
Micius v. St. Paul City Council
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 6, 1994No. C3-94-780PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
Appellant sought review in the district court of the St. Paul City Council’s denial of his liquor license application. The district court dismissed appellant’s lawsuit for lack of jurisdiction. This appeal is from the judgment of dismissal. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Claude Micius applied for an off-sale liquor license to operate a liquor store in St. Paul. The St. Paul Office of License, Inspections and Environmental Protection determined that Micius met the minimum requirements of the St. Paul Legislative Code for the issuance of an off-sale liquor license and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Oakman v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Strand v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Township of Honner v. Redwood CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Country Liquors, Inc. v. City Council of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Press v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- DeLite Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of St. PaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2001