Legal Opinion

Schuran v. Walnut Hill Assoc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 16, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

256 N.J. Super. 228 (1991)

606 A.2d 885

SCHURAN, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,

v.

WALNUT HILL ASSOCIATES, A NEW JERSEY GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, MEDFORD LAND COMPANY, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, GERALD D. VINGL, AND WARREN WITTMAN, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Camden County.

Decided December 16, 1991.

Clifford L. Van Syoc (Van Syoc Law Offices) Attorney for Plaintiff.

Steven D. Scherzer (Cooper, Perskie, April, Niedelman, Wagenheim & Levenson) Attorneys for Defendants, Warren Wittman and Medford Land Company, Inc.

Stephen…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Borough of Matawan v. Monmouth County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. AMN, Inc. v. Township of South Brunswick Rent Leveling BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co. v. KrumseigSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Carlo v. the Okonite-Callender Cable Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, DelawareSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  2. Dopp v. YariDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
  3. L & T International Corp. v. BenaventeSupreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands · 1997
  4. Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, DelawareSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API