Legal Opinion

Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, Delaware

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 9, 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

912 A.2d 88 (2006)

189 N.J. 1

Jaliyah MUHAMMAD, on her own behalf and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

COUNTY BANK OF REHOBOTH BEACH, DELAWARE and Main Street Service Corporation, Defendants-Respondents, and

Easycash, Telecash, John Doe and John Roe, Defendants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 14, 2006.

Decided August 9, 2006.

Michael J. Quirk, a member of the New York and District of Columbia bars, argued the cause for appellant (Trujillo, Rodriguez & Richards and Williams, Cuker & Berezofsky, attorneys; Mr. Quirk, Donna Siegel Moffa and Mark R. Cuker, on the…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · LaVECCHIA; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API