Legal Opinion

State v. Naititi

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2004No. 25779PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

LEVINSON, J.

The plaintiff-appellant State of Hawai'i [hereinafter, “the prosecution”] appeals from the findings of fact (FOFs), conclusions of law (COLs), and order of the first circuit court, the Honorable Sandra A. Simms presiding, ruling that certain statements that the defendant-appellee Samuel Naititi made to Honolulu Police Department (HPD) Detective Phillip Lavarías were involuntary, within the meaning of Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 621-26 (1993),1 and therefore inadmissible at trial. As a threshold matter, the prosecution asserts that it is entitled to…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. JosephHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Grissom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. State v. EliHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. McKnight.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. WalkerHawaii Supreme Court · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API