Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Votaw v. Matia

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1932No. 23720PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

This cause originated in the Court of Appeals, resulting in a decision against the re lator. The relator now seeks a reversal of the judgment below in this court.

The proceeding was one in mandamus, wherein the relator, Garfield A. Yotaw, asked for a writ commanding the respondent, Felix T. Matia, to restore him to his position as commissioner of markets, weights and measures of the city of Cleveland. The cause was heard on the petition, answer, reply and the evidence adduced upon the issues therein made.

It appears that on July 3, 1924, the relator was appointed “market…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Patton v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. State Ex Rel. Dewald v. MatiaOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bardo v. City of LyndhurstOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. McArthur v. DeSouzaOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Bednar v. City of North CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Regetz v. Cleveland Civil Service CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Bednar v. N. CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API