N. C. Coastal Motor Line, Inc. v. Everette Truck Line, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
The question we are called upon to decide is whether Everette pleaded an affirmative defense such that it was entitled to a summary judgment as a matter of law. We conclude that as a matter of law Everette was not entitled to a summary judgment.
The purpose of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56 motion for summary judgment is to avoid a useless trial. See, Pridgen v. Hughes, 9 N.C. App. 635, 177 S.E. 2d 425 (1970). The initial applications of the rule in this country were primarily actions in which debtors chose to defend rather than default. Id. In pertinent part G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Pridgen v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Perfecting Service Co. v. Product Development & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carriker v. CarrikerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Erthal v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Mountain Federal Land Bank v. First Union National BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Buckner v. TigerSwan, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- In Re Se. Eye Ctr. (Old Battleground v. Ccsea)North Carolina Business Court · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.