Cooke v. Cain
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clallam county, Hatch, J., entered July 27, 1903, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, dismissing an action for an accounting and a balance due for commissions.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
Appellant brought this action against respondents and alleged, that, at the times mentioned, the latter composed a copartnership, doing business as dealers in real estate, under the firm name of Cain Investment Company, with their principal place of business in the city of Port Angeles, Washington; that on the 23d day of January, 1900, and for many years prior thereto, appellant was a resident of the city of Boston, Massachusetts; that on said date respondent Cain was in said city of Boston, representing said firm in the business of selling real estate situate in the city of Port Angeles and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burns v. FoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- McPherson v. WestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Excelsior Manufacturing Co. v. BoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- Western Loan & Savings Co. v. WaismanWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Hedges v. RoachNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Molyneux v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Robb v. MoffettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Lohnes v. Meenk Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- Rowe v. HosherWashington Supreme Court · 1920