Legal Opinion

Robb v. Moffett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 15, 1925No. 15542PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

Plaintiff and defendant will be designated herein as they appeared in the trial court. It appears from the record, plaintiff was connected with a firm of real estate dealers in Tulsa, and entered into a written agreement with defendant, by the terms of which defendant was to furnish the money and plaintiff the “brain,” or “ability” for the securing of land and the building of a house thereon. Defendant agreed to sell the house, and share with-the plaintiff the profits realized on such sale. Defendant furnished $1,250. and purchased the lots, and plaintiff secured a loan on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eyster v. Centennial Board of FinanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Dickerson v. FinleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Di Palma v. WeinmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Thurston v. HamblinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Crawford v. CalkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Darrell D. Parks, Carl T. Ramsey and Phillips Petroleum Company, a Corporation v. Riverside Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  2. Badger v. DukesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Greenback v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Nichlos v. Hanbury-Russell Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API