Robb v. Moffett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
Plaintiff and defendant will be designated herein as they appeared in the trial court. It appears from the record, plaintiff was connected with a firm of real estate dealers in Tulsa, and entered into a written agreement with defendant, by the terms of which defendant was to furnish the money and plaintiff the “brain,” or “ability” for the securing of land and the building of a house thereon. Defendant agreed to sell the house, and share with-the plaintiff the profits realized on such sale. Defendant furnished $1,250. and purchased the lots, and plaintiff secured a loan on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eyster v. Centennial Board of FinanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Dickerson v. FinleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Di Palma v. WeinmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
- Thurston v. HamblinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Crawford v. CalkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Darrell D. Parks, Carl T. Ramsey and Phillips Petroleum Company, a Corporation v. Riverside Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Badger v. DukesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Greenback v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Nichlos v. Hanbury-Russell Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934