Legal Opinion

Pengal v. Mentor-On-The-Lake, Unpublished Decision (9-23-2005)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 23, 2005No. 2004-L-158UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} This appeal stems from a decision of the Lake County Court of Common Pleas in which the court held that the City of Mentor-on-the-Lake's zoning ordinance section 1252.04 was unconstitutional as applied to the sublot owned by appellee, Charles A. Pengal and, further, that the denial of appellee's requested variance constituted an unconstitutional taking of appellee's property.

{¶ 2} The following undisputed facts are relevant to a determination of this appeal. Appellee owns a sublot in the City of Mentor-on-the-Lake, Ohio, that is known as 18 Manor Drive. Appellee purchased the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Driscoll v. Austintown AssociatesOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State ex rel. Shemo v. City of Mayfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Haisley v. Mercer Cty. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 10-07-05 (11-13-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API