Legal Opinion
Haisley v. Mercer Cty. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 10-07-05 (11-13-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 13, 2007No. 10-07-05PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Although originally placed on our accelerated calendar, we have elected, pursuant to Local Rule 12(5), to issue a full opinion in lieu of a judgment entry.
{¶ 2} The Mercer County Board of Zoning Appeals appeals the judgment of the Mercer County Court of Common Pleas, which reversed and vacated the board's decision to deny a zoning variance to Phillip and Janet Haisley.
{¶ 3} On August 15, 1996 the Haisleys purchased Lot Number 77 in Highland Park Addition, in Jefferson Township Mercer County, Ohio. A single family residence is located on Lot 77. On November 24, 1997, the Haisleys…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Foster v. WickliffeOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Schellhardt v. Mercer Cty. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 10-07-28 (5-5-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Bayliff v. Stokes Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2024