Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1986No. 521A84PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

Defendant seeks a new trial because of an alleged error committed by the trial court. Defendant, a juvenile, contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his confession because it was obtained in violation of his right to be free from compelled self-incrimination, to have counsel present, and to have his mother present. Having carefully reviewed the record and the relevant law, we conclude that defendant’s confession was obtained in violation of his juvenile rights as set forth in N.C.G.S. § 7A-595, and that the motion to suppress was improperly denied.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. MariniSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  3. State v. MahaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. TorresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Rogers v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API