State v. Torres
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FRYE, Justice.
While in police custody awaiting questioning about the shooting death of her twenty-nine-year-old husband, defendant asked sheriff officials whether she needed an attorney. She was told she did not. A short time later, defendant was read her Miranda rights and agreed to make a statement. The statement, in which defendant confessed to shooting her husband, was introduced at trial over defendant’s objection. Defendant now petitions this Court for a new trial, arguing that the trial court erred by admitting the statement.
The issue presented is whether defendant invoked her right…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Harold S. Alston v. Walter Redman, Warden Charles M. Oberly, Iii, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and the State of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.