Legal Opinion

State v. Torres

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1992No. 316A90PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

While in police custody awaiting questioning about the shooting death of her twenty-nine-year-old husband, defendant asked sheriff officials whether she needed an attorney. She was told she did not. A short time later, defendant was read her Miranda rights and agreed to make a statement. The statement, in which defendant confessed to shooting her husband, was introduced at trial over defendant’s objection. Defendant now petitions this Court for a new trial, arguing that the trial court erred by admitting the statement.

The issue presented is whether defendant invoked her right…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Harold S. Alston v. Walter Redman, Warden Charles M. Oberly, Iii, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and the State of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API