Hebron v. United States

STEADMAN, Associate Judge, with whom Senior Judge KING joins,

concurring:

As the principal author of the per cu-riam opinion, I must agree that to sustain the first degree theft conviction on the record before us would strain our extensive case precedents relating to proof of value and binding upon a panel of this court. See M.A.P. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310 (D.C.1971). One might wonder, however, whether the time has come to re-examine that body of case law.

As set forth in Part 11(B) of the per curiam opinion addressing proof of intent, our normal standard of review for sufficiency of the evidence…