Legal Opinion

Wilson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1976No. 9422PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted after a jury trial of one count of grand larceny. (D.C.Code 1973, § 22-2201). On appeal he contends that the evidence produced by the government was insufficient to support a finding that the value of the stolen property exceeded $100. 1 We agree and reverse.

Appellant was found guilty of stealing a brown leather coat on January 16, 1974. The only direct evidence of value presented to the jury was the appearance of the coat at trial and the testimony of the owner that the coat had been purchased during the 1973 Christmas season for $150. At the time of the theft, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Eugene E. ThweattCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. In re J. F. T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Boone v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. United States v. William D. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Salim v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Malloy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Eldridge v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Sterling v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API