Legal Opinion
In re R. D. J.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 8, 1975No. 7936PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant was charged in a juvenile petition with burglary in the second degree and grand larceny in violation of D.C. Code 1973, §§ 22-1801 (b) and -2201, respectively, and, after a fact-finding hearing, was found guilty of both offenses. He assigns as errors (1) the trial court’s failure to order the government to produce purported Jencks Act material,1 (2) its refusal to appoint special counsel for two juvenile witnesses, (3) its denial of appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal on the grand larceny charge, and (4) an asserted noncompliance with Super.Ct.Juv.R. 31(a), requiring…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jefferson Crawford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- John L. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re T.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- March v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Malloy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.