Legal Opinion
Shipping Room Suppliers, Inc. v. Schoenlaub
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County
Decided February 7, 1951No. A-121001Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By BADER, J.
This case came before the Court on the citation for Sam Schoenlaub to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt of Court.
The evidence adduced at the hearing and the affidavit indicate that Harry R. Schoenlaub, one of the defendants, was employed by the plaintiff, Shipping Room Suppliers, Inc., under a written contract of employment wherein it was agreed “that for a period of two years” after he (Harry Schoenlaub) *267leaves the employment of T. M. Sasser, that he will not engage in the manufacture, handling, servicing or distribution of material handling equipment,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re LennonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Toledo, A. A. & N. M. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
- Berger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Mexican Ore Co. v. Mexican Guadalupe Mining Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1891
- Dadirrian v. GullianU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.