Legal Opinion
Dadirrian v. Gullian
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
Decided March 8, 1897PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
This suit was brought, for the infringement of the complainant's trade-mark “Matzoon,” and was begun iu June, 1894, against Mugerditch Gullian, Albert Gullian, and Otto Heisenbuttel, doing business as M. Gullian & Co., iu this district, and sucli proceedings were had that on October .11, 1895, a perpetual Injunction was issued out of this court and duly served upon the said defendants. The writ was in the usual form, commanding the said defendants, their and every of their “attorneys, agents, clerics, aud servants, to desist from preparing, putting up, selling,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Toledo, A. A. & N. M. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
- People Ex Rel. Morris v. . RandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Slater v. . MerrittNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Mexican Ore Co. v. Mexican Guadalupe Mining Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1891
- Stahl v. ErtelU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Illnois · 1893
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alemite Mfg. Corporation v. StaffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Stablemen & Helpers v. Keystone Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Cassidy v. Puett Electrical Starting Gate Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- L. E. Waterman Co. v. Standard Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- State ex rel. Pool v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.