Perkins v. Keller
Michigan Supreme Court
Case made from Bay. Ejectment. Plaintiffs recovered below. Identity of name does not determine tbe identity of the newspaper to which it pertains. Scammon v. Chicago 40 111. X46.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
The defendants Keller and Ancel bring up this cause on case made, alleging errors which they claim prejudiced them in the court below.
Perkins and Sumner sued in ejectment, and defendants set up title under a mortgage foreclosure by advertisement. This was objected to as irregular on two grounds: first, -that the deed on foreclosure was not filed in the register’s office until twenty days after sale; and second, that the publication of notice was imperfect.
Upon the first point we think the objection is not well taken. We have held in Lilly v. Gibbs 39 Mich. 394, that the time of redemption in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sage v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Grover v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Doyle v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
- Hinchman v. BarnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Lilly v. GibbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mills v. JirasekMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Proper v. ProperHawaii Supreme Court · 1903
- Hunterdon County Democrat, Inc. v. Recorder Publishing Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Great Lakes Prop Mgt Consultants Inc v. Hp Foreclosure SolutionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023