Legal Opinion

Mills v. Jirasek

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1934No. Docket No. 95, Calendar No. 37,753PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiff filed a bill to quiet title to certain lands in West Bloomfield township, Oakland county, Michigan, to which she claimed title by sheriff’s deed. The deed was executed May 23, 1931, following a mortgage foreclosure by advertisement, but was not deposited with the register of deeds until September 14,1931. Defendant made no attempt to redeem from the sale, but refused to recognize its validity because of plaintiff’s failure to record the deed within 20 days from the date of sale. The instant suit was not commenced until the time for redemption had expired, as computed from the date…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reading v. WatermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Johnstone v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Grover v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Doyle v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Lau v. ScribnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conlin v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. David M Kessler v. Longview Agricultural Asset Management LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. Great Lakes Prop Mgt Consultants Inc v. Hp Foreclosure SolutionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API