Legal Opinion

Lilly v. Gibbs

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Cass. Bill to set aside foreclosure proceedings, and to redeem. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

This bill was filed'in January, 1875, to set aside proceedings for the foreclosure of a mortgage under the statute, and for redemption. A decree was given for complainant and the defendant appealed.

On the 9th of May, 1857, Noel B. Hollister and wife mortgaged the premises to defendant for $500 and after-wards and on the 2d of December, 1868, they again mortgaged them except a strip of two feet, to complainant, and in the forepart of 1873 this mortgage was foreclosed at law and the premises were purchased thereon by complainant. He went into possession. No question is made concerning these…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perkins v. KellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Mills v. JirasekMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. David M Kessler v. Longview Agricultural Asset Management LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. Great Lakes Prop Mgt Consultants Inc v. Hp Foreclosure SolutionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API