Legal Opinion
Kalinoski v. Gutierrez
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 25, 2006No. Civil Action 04-1206 (JDB)PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this employment-discrimination action requires the Court to determine whether there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable jury could conclude, first, that plaintiff — a former employee of the United States Department of Commerce — suffered objectively tangible harm as a result of either of two challenged personnel actions and, second, that one or both of those personnel actions was done, at least in part, because of plaintiffs sex or because she had engaged in protected activity by filing a…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Laughlin v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Lewis v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Robinson-Reeder v. Am. Council on Educ.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Edwards v. AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Sewell v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.