Legal Opinion
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rochester v. Pellechia
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 11, 1993No. 11285PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the denial of its motion for deficiency judgment following the granting of its motion for strict foreclosure and the expira*261tion of the law day.1 On appeal, the plaintiff asserts that “the trial court improperly found that it had not timely moved for a deficiency judgment pursuant to General Statutes § 49-14 because its motion bore an incorrect docket number.”2 We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are necessary for a proper resolution of this appeal. The plaintiff brought an action for strict foreclosure after the defendant defaulted on a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hillman v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Chestnut Realty, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Rogozinski v. American Food Service Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Van Mecklenburg v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. PellechiaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Diamond v. DiamondConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. GillespieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Chartier v. ValliereConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- Chartier v. ValliereConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.