Vietti v. Hines
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in an action for personal injuries, the cause having been tried by the court without a jury.
On April 16, 1918, plaintiff, a woodcutter, employed by Lamoine Lumber Company, at Lamoine, was visiting in Redding. He went to Redding, he testified, to take a “couple of days’ lay-off.” At about 5 o’clock that evening he received a telegram recalling him to Lamoine. The telegram read: “Lamoine, California, 9:08 A. M. April 16th, 1918. A. Vietti, care of B. Vietti, Redding, California. Come up at once. We found several mistakes in the bill. Cannot…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- H.M. Filer v. . New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Seller v. Market-Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Johnson v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McBride v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Ingham v. Luxor Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Lund v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Lund v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944