Commonwealth v. Vega
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, President Judge Emeritus.
¶ 1 Jose Vega appeals, pro se, from the order entered July 19, 1999, disposing of his second petition brought pursuant to the Post, Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546 (“PCRA” or “the Act”). Vega’s petition was dismissed on the basis of untimeliness, pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9545. We affirm.
¶ 2 In May of 1991, Vega shot and killed his paramour’s husband in the presence of witnesses. Subsequently, on February 10, 1992, the Honorable Joseph D. O’Keefe conducted a bench trial at which he found Vega guilty of third-degree murder and possession of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. LarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. MonacoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. BreakironSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.