Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Vega

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 2000PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge Emeritus.

¶ 1 Jose Vega appeals, pro se, from the order entered July 19, 1999, disposing of his second petition brought pursuant to the Post, Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546 (“PCRA” or “the Act”). Vega’s petition was dismissed on the basis of untimeliness, pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9545. We affirm.

¶ 2 In May of 1991, Vega shot and killed his paramour’s husband in the presence of witnesses. Subsequently, on February 10, 1992, the Honorable Joseph D. O’Keefe conducted a bench trial at which he found Vega guilty of third-degree murder and possession of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. LarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. MonacoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. BreakironSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API