Legal Opinion
Larkin v. Local No. 560, C., America
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided August 5, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The respondent, James Larkin, is charged with having violated certain provisions of an ad interim restraint contained in an order to show cause which appears to have been issued April 16th, 1927, though erroneously dated April 16th, 1922. The solicitor of the respondent urges that the mattersub judice is treated as a step in a civil cause, that is, in the case of General Woodcraft Company, Incorporated,complainant, v. Local No. 560, International Brotherhood ofTeamsters, Chauffeurs, Stablemen and Helpers of America et al., defendants, and not, as he claims it should be, as a separate and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re NevittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Staley v. South Jersey Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- New Jersey Painting Co. v. Local No. 26, Brotherhood of PaintersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
- Oscar Barnett Foundry Co. v. CroweNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re ClawansNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Ivens v. Empire Floor Wall Tile Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Laurie v. RyanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- In Re JibbNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937