Legal Opinion

In Re Jibb

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 26, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The respondent Robert E. Jibb being without the jurisdiction of the court and therefore not served with the petition and order to show cause, the hearing on the return of the order to show cause was proceeded with against the respondent George E. Stupalsky alone.

The situation which gave rise to the petition to hold the respondent in contempt is substantially this: A bill of complaint supported by affidavit was filed on August 20th, 1934, alleging mismanagement, fraud and insolvency, and praying for the appointment of a receiver for the National Finance Corporation of America. The respondents,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Edwards v. EdwardsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  2. Seastream v. New Jersey Exhibition Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
  3. Seastream v. New Jersey Exhibition Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  4. Backer v. A.B. B. Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  5. In Re SingerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kerr Steamship Co., Inc. v. WesthoffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. Franklin v. FranklinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API