Legal Opinion

Oscar Barnett Foundry Co. v. Crowe

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 13, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On motion to adjudge respondent of contempt.

1Opinion of the Court

Howell, V. C.

On August 31st, 1909, the complainant on filing his bill herein took an order requiring the defendant to show cause why an in*110junction should not issue pursuant to the prayer thereof with a provision in the order restraining the defendant “from manufacturing for and selling to the Commercial Trust Company of Jersey City any mechanical chain grate stoker embodying the features set forth in the patent,” &c. On the return day of this order the court ordered that the same be made absolute and that an injunction should issue according to the prayer of the bill. An injunction was issued…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re ClawansNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Larkin v. Local No. 560, C., AmericaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  3. Laurie v. RyanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API